At the Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Absattar Adil Maratuly will defend her dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) on the topic: «The anthropogenic nature of emotive-evaluative vocabulary (Based on the texts of Kazakh and foreign media» 8D02303 – Linguistics.
The dissertation was performed at the Department of Turkology and theory of language of the Al-Farabi Kazakh National University.
Form of defense – Dissertation Work
Language of defense – Kazakh
Official reviewers:
1. Zholshaeva Maira Satybaldievna – doctor of philology, associate professor, SDU University (Kaskelen, Kazakhstan);
2. Amirbekova Aigul Baidebekovna – candidate of philology, head of the lexicology Department of the Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynov (Almaty, Kazakhstan).
Scientific supervisors:
1. Mambetova Manshuk Kudaibergenovna – candidate of philology, senior lecturer of the Department of turkology and theory of language (Almaty, Kazakhstan);
2. Sema Aslan Demir – PhD, professor of Hacdettepe University (Ankara, Turkey).
Temporary members of the Dissertation Council:
1. Aydan Irgatoğlu – PhD, Associate Professor, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University (Ankara, Turkey);
2. Yessenova Kalbike – doctor of philology, professor, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University (Almaty, Kazakhstan);
3. Mukhamejanova Gulmira Tastemirovna – PhD, associate professor, head of the Department of kazakh language and literature of the M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University (Petropavl, Kazakhstan).
The defense will be held offline/online on November 8, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. at the Dissertation Council at al-Farabi Kazakh National University under the educational program “6D021300, 8D02303 – Linguistics, 6D021000, 8D02306 – Foreign Philology, 8D01705 – Foreign languages: two foreign languages, 6D020700, 8D02302 – Translation”. Venue: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Faculty of Journalism, room 212.
Connect to the Zoom Conference:
https://zoom.us/j/97934859164?pwd=fRkWMG8bmqwEIM09z52doZ3qLWiiGt.1
Conference ID: 979 3485 9164
Conclussion of the ethics commissions