Academic Committee for the Quality of Learning and Teaching

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1 This Regulation defines the principles for organizing the activities of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the Faculty of Oriental Studies.

1.2 This Regulation is a document of the quality management system of the faculty.

1.3 The Academic Committee is a collegial administrative and executive body of management, which in its activities is guided by the current regulatory legal acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.

1.3. The Academic Committee is called upon to carry out comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

1.4. The Academic Committee in its activities is accountable to the Member of the Board - Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, Director of the Department for Academic Affairs.

1.5. The Academic Committee is an independent structure.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation:

A process is a set of interrelated and interacting activities that transform inputs into outputs.

Credit technology of education - training based on the choice and independent planning by students of the sequence of studying disciplines using credit as a unified unit for measuring the volume of educational work of the student and teacher.

Educational program (hereinafter referred to as EP) is a training program that includes a set of training modules aimed at mastering key competencies by students.

The quality of education is an integral characteristic of the education system, reflecting the degree of compliance of actual educational results achieved with regulatory requirements, social and personal expectations.

Quality monitoring is an independent, documented process of objective quality assessment in order to determine the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.

Learning outcomes are a set of competencies that express what exactly the trainee will understand or be able to do at the end of the learning process.

Ensuring the quality of education is the process of creating conditions conducive to the quality of education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curricula and program).

Guarantee - objectively and reasonably evaluate the results of education and thereby guarantee its quality level.

Quality improvement is a systematic activity of the university, aimed at continuous improvement of the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.

Conditions for the implementation of the educational program - a set of personnel, material and technical, educational and methodological, informational, financial and social support of the educational process.

The key competencies of a university graduate are systemic thinking (critical, strategic) - creativity, communication (intersectoral, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, awareness, objective assessment and decision making, creativity, readiness to accept new things.

Quality indicators - a guiding principle for improving quality, has the function of measuring, signaling the quality of the educational process.

Categories of quality indicators: quantitative, qualitative, input, process indicators, output, strategic, actions.

Culture of quality - quality is consciously introduced into the daily activities of the faculty. The faculty evaluates its own practice against external requirements and contributes to the improvement of staff training

SWOT analysis is a method of strategic planning, which consists in identifying factors of the internal and external environment of the organization

Student-centered learning is both a way of thinking and a culture within the faculty and is characterized by innovative teaching methods that aim to promote learning in interaction with faculty and other students, as well as the perception of students as active participants in their own learning.

3 PURPOSE AND MAIN OBJECTIVES

3.1. The purpose of the activity of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Learning and Teaching is to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the faculty, taking into account the specifics of training specialists.

3.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee for the quality of education and teaching at the faculty include:

- the complexity of planning and management of educational activities, which is provided by a system of principles aimed at improving the quality of education in order to comply with international standards of higher and postgraduate education;

- support and development of academic traditions and innovations in education;

- realization of the right of students to participate in the management of the educational process in order to ensure the protection of the rights of students in obtaining a quality education, as well as in assisting the faculty in solving the upcoming tasks of preparing competitive graduates;

- improved and updated

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
1.1. This Regulation defines the principles for organizing the activities of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty of Geography and Nature Management (hereinafter referred to as the Committee), developed in accordance with the Academic Policy of the University
1.2. The academic committee at the faculty is a collegial administrative and executive body of management, which in its activities is guided by the current regulatory legal acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.
1.3. Academic Committee - designed to carry out comprehensive monitoring and implementation of the Academic policy of the university at the faculty.
1.4. The academic committee at the faculty is an independent structure.
1.5. The Academic Committee in its activities is accountable to the Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, Director of the Department of Academic Affairs of the University.
2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation:
Process - a set of interrelated and interacting activities that transform inputs into outputs.
Credit technology of education - training based on the choice and independent planning by students of the sequence of studying disciplines using credit as a unified unit for measuring the volume of educational work of the student and teacher. Educational program (hereinafter - EP) - a training program that includes a set of training modules aimed at mastering key competencies by students.
The quality of education is an integral characteristic of the education system, reflecting the degree of compliance of actual educational results achieved with regulatory requirements, social and personal expectations.
Quality monitoring is an independent, documented process of objective quality assessment in order to determine the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.
Learning outcomes are sets of competencies that express what exactly the trainee will understand or be able to do at the end of the learning process.
Ensuring the quality of education is the process of creating conditions conducive to the quality of education (providing educational resources, infrastructure, curricula and programs).
Guarantee - objectively and reasonably evaluate the results of education and thereby guarantee its quality level.
Improving the quality of education is a systematic activity of the university, aimed at constantly improving the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.
Conditions for the implementation of the educational program - a set of personnel, material and technical, educational and methodological, informational, financial and social support of the educational process. The key competencies of a university graduate are systemic thinking (critical, strategic) - creativity, communication (intersectoral, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, awareness, objective assessment and decision-making, creativity, readiness to perceive new Quality indicators education - the guiding principle of quality improvement, has the function of measuring, signaling the quality of the educational process
Categories of education quality indicators: quantitative, qualitative, input, process indicators, output, strategic, actions
Educational quality culture - quality is consciously introduced into the daily activities of the faculty. The faculty evaluates its own practice against external requirements and contributes to the improvement of staff training
SWOT analysis - a method of strategic planning, which consists in identifying factors in the internal and external environment of the organization Student-centered learning - represents both a way of thinking and culture within the faculty and is characterized by innovative teaching methods, the purpose of which is to promote learning in communication with teachers and other students, and the perception of students as active participants in their own learning.
3. PURPOSE AND MAIN OBJECTIVES
3.1. The purpose of the activity of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty of GI PP is to increase the efficiency and ensure the quality of the educational process at the departments of the faculty.
3.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty of GIPP include:
  - the complexity of planning and managing educational activities, which is based on the principles of modernization and compliance with international standards of higher and postgraduate education;
- introduction of innovations and further development of academic traditions in education;
- realization of the right of students to participate in the management of the educational process in order to ensure the democratization of the educational process, the realization of the rights of students to receive a quality education, in solving the problems of preparing competitive graduates;
- improvement and constant updating of the content, motivational and value

- implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities in order to improve the scientific content of educational programs and unlock the research potential of the personality of a specialist prepared for productive research activities;
- implementation of a program of interaction with employers on the formation of targeted practical training of specialists.
4. FUNCTIONS
4.1. Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty of GIPP:
• examines and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, doctoral studies (design, planning, organization, provision) and makes appropriate recommendations to all authorized departments of the faculty;
• monitors the implementation of recommendations, as well as monitoring educational activities.
4.2. The Academic Committee considers issues of academic integrity.
4.3. The Academic Committee considers the results of monitoring the progress of students in educational programs to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.
4.4. The Academic Committee analyzes reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in a particular educational program.
4.5. Decisions of the Academic Committee of the Faculty of Guy PP on issues of violation of academic honesty are the basis for the application of disciplinary and administrative measures.
5. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS
5.1. The personal composition of the Academic Committee is approved by the decision of the Academic Council of the faculty from experienced teachers with scientific and methodological work experience of at least 10-15 years, employers, students and graduates. Students must make up at least 20% of the total composition of the Committee.
5.2. Employees of the University, faculty holding leadership positions, cannot be members of the Academic Committee.
5.3. Participation in the work of the Academic Committee is voluntary.
5.4. The composition of the Academic Committee is approved for a period of at least 2 years with the possibility of replacing the members of the committee and including new members, if necessary, on the proposal of the Academic Council of the faculty.
5.5. The Chairman of the Academic Committee is elected from among the members of the committee by a general vote of all its members.
5.6. To keep minutes of the meetings of the Academic Committee, a secretary is appointed from among its members.
5.7. Candidates for members of the Academic Committee are approved at a meeting of the Academic Council of the Faculty by open voting.
5.8. The issues of the quality of education at the meetings of the Academic Committee are discussed as necessary, but at least once a semester.
5.9. The Academic Committee carries out its activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the Academic Council of the Faculty for the academic year. 5.10. Meetings of the Academic Committee for the quality of education at the faculty are documented in minutes.
5.11. The report on the work of the Academic Committee of the Faculty of Geography and Nature Management is submitted to the Academic Council of the Faculty at least once a year.
5.12. The Academic Committee of the Faculty of Geography and Nature Management interacts with structural divisions of the Faculty, third-party organizations and institutions within the framework of various activities of the Committee, if necessary to solve the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.
5.13. The Academic Committee of the Faculty of Geography and Nature Management is responsible for the objectivity and quality of decisions made.
5.14. The Academic Committee of the Faculty of GIPP has the right to:
– submit for consideration by the Academic Council issues related to the activities of the Committee;
- come up with proposals to the dean of the faculty, organizations, associations on issues within the jurisdiction of the Committee;
– request the necessary certificates and documents for the activities of the Academic Committee of the Faculty of Geography and Nature Management;
–participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the Faculty of Geography and Nature Management;
- give recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms and methods of teaching;
– hear reports of the heads of structural divisions at their meetings;
- appoint and conduct an examination and create commissions for various types of audit;

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. This Regulation defines the principle of organization of activities of the Academic Committee on the Quality of Education at the Faculty of the University.

1.2. The academic committee is a collegial administrative and executive management body, which in its activity is guided by the current normative legal acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and normative documents of the university.

1.3. The academic committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

2. OBJECTIVES AND MAIN OBJECTIVES

2.1. The purpose of the activity of the Academic Committee on the Quality of Education of the Faculty is to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the faculties of the university.

2.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee on the Quality of Education of the Faculty include:

- the complexity of planning and management of educational activities is ensured by a system of principles aimed at its modernization in order to meet international standards of higher and post-graduate education;

- development of academic traditions and innovations in education;

- implementation of the right of students to participate in the management of the educational process in order to ensure the protection of the rights of students to receive quality education, as well as to assist the faculty in solving the tasks facing them in preparing competitive graduates;

- improvement and renewal of content, motivational, value components of educational programs as a means of purposeful formation of a competitive graduate-specialist, ready for constant professional growth, social and professional mobility;

- the implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for revealing the scientific research potential of a specialist, ready for productive research activities;

- implementation of the program of interaction with employers on the issues of targeted training of specialists.

3. FUNCTION

3.1. Academic committee on the quality of education of the faculty:

• reviews and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, doctoral (design, planning, organization, maintenance) and makes appropriate recommendations to all authorized structural divisions of the university;

• develops recommendations;

• monitors implementation of recommendations, as well as monitoring of educational activities.

3.2. The Academic Committee considers issues of academic integrity.

3.3. The academic committee reviews the results of monitoring the progress of students in educational programs with the aim of developing proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

3.4. The academic committee reviews the report on monitoring the satisfaction of students with the educational program and the quality of teaching.

3.5. Decisions of the Academic Committee on violations of academic honesty serve as the basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

4. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, LAW

4.1. The personnel composition of the Academic Committee is approved by the decision of the Academic Council of the faculty from experienced teachers with at least 10-15 years of scientific and methodological experience.

4.2. Participation in the work of the Academic Committee is voluntary.

4.3. The composition of the Academic Committee is approved for a period of at least 3 years with the possibility of replacing members of the committee and including new members, if necessary, upon the recommendation of the Academic Council of the Faculty.

4.4. The Chairman of the Academic Committee is elected from among the members of the Committee by a general vote of all its members.

4.5. A secretary is appointed from among its members to keep minutes of meetings of the Academic Committee.

4.6. Candidates for members of the Academic Committee are approved by open voting at the meeting of the Academic Council of the faculty.

4.7. Issues of educational quality are discussed at meetings of the Academic Committee as necessary.

4.8. Sessions of the Academic Committee on the Quality of Education of the Faculty are drawn up with protocols.

4.9. The Academic Committee cooperates with structural divisions of the Faculty, external organizations and institutions within the framework of various types of activities of the Committee, if it is necessary to solve the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

4.10. The academic committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of decisions.

4.11. The academic committee has the right to:

- submit questions related to the activities of the Committee to the Academic Council for consideration;

- come up with proposals to the dean's faculty, organizations, associations on issues related to the management of the Committee;

- request the necessary certificates and documents for the activities of the Academic Committee;

- to assist and participate in the evaluation of the quality of the educational process at the faculty;

- give recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, occupations, forms and methods of training;

- listen to the reports of the heads of structural divisions at their meetings;

- do not accept for consideration and return for processing poorly and negligently prepared documents.

‒ to appoint and carry out an examination and create a commission for different types of audit;

‒ to demand the necessary documents from any teacher of the department, employee of the dean's office, any employee of the university within the scope of his competence;

‒ attract teachers to carry out individual assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. This Regulation establishes the principles for organizing the activities of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the Faculty of Physics and Technology (hereinafter referred to as the Committee).

1.2. This Regulation is a document of the quality management system of the Faculty of Physics and Technology at al-Farabi KazNU University.

1.3. The Committee is a collegial governing and executive body that operates in accordance with the current regulatory legal acts in the field of education in the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.

1.4. The Committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

1.5. The Committee is accountable in its activities to the Member of the Board - Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, Director of the Department for Academic Affairs.

1.6. The Committee is an independent structure.

2. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

2.1. The objective of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the university faculties.

2.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty include:

- Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities, ensuring their modernization to comply with international standards of higher and postgraduate education.
- Development of academic traditions and innovations in education.
- Implementation of students' rights to participate in the management of the educational process, aiming to protect their rights to obtain quality education and contribute to the faculty in preparing competitive graduates.
- Improvement and updating of the content, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposeful formation of competitive graduates who are ready for continuous professional growth, social and professional mobility.
- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for revealing the research potential of a specialist, prepared for productive research activities.
- Implementation of programs for interaction with employers regarding targeted training of specialists.

3. FUNCTIONS

3.1. The Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty:

- Considers and assesses the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs (design, planning, organization, and support) and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.
- Develops recommendations.
- Monitors the implementation of recommendations and monitors educational activities.

3.2. The Committee addresses issues of academic integrity.

3.3. The Committee reviews the results of monitoring the academic performance of students in educational programs in order to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

3.4. The Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the educational program.

3.5. Decisions of the Committee on academic integrity violations serve as a basis for the application of disciplinary and administrative measures.

4. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

4.1. The personnel of the faculty's Committee are formed from experienced teachers who have at least 10-15 years of scientific, pedagogical, and methodological experience. The composition of the Committee is approved by the decision of the Faculty Council. Participation in the Committee's work is voluntary.

4.2. The Chairman of the Committee is elected by all its members through a general vote.

4.3. A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Committee to keep the minutes of the Committee's meetings.

4.4. The candidates for Committee members are approved by an open vote at the Faculty Council meeting.

4.5. Quality of education matters are discussed at the Committee's meetings as needed but no less than once per semester.

4.6. Meetings of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty are documented through minutes.

4.7. The Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of various activities of the Committee, if necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

4.8. The Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

4.9. The Committee has the right to:

- Submit matters related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Faculty Council.
- Make suggestions to the Dean of the faculty, organizations, and associations on matters pertaining to the Committee's responsibilities.
- Request necessary information and documents for the Committee's activities.
- Contribute to and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the faculty.
- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms, and methods of teaching.
- Hear reports from the heads of structural units at its meetings.
- Refuse to consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision.

Members of the Committee have the right to:

- Make suggestions for improving all aspects of the educational process.
- Appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions for various types of audits.
- Demand necessary documents from any faculty member, department staff, or university employee within their competence.
- Engage teachers to fulfill specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. This Regulation defines the principles of organization of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Law Faculty.

1.2. This Regulation is a document of the quality management system of the Law Faculty.

1.3. The Committee is a collegial executive body that operates in accordance with the current legislative acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.

1.4. The Committee (ACQE) is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the Law Faculty.

1.5. The Committee is accountable to the Member of the Board, Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, and the Director of the Department for Academic Affairs.

1.6. The Committee is an independent structure.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation:

Process - a set of interconnected and interacting types of activities that transform inputs into outputs.

Credit-based learning technology - learning based on the choice and independent planning of the sequence of studying disciplines by the learner, using credits as a standardized unit of measurement for the volume of student and teacher workload.

Educational program (hereinafter referred to as EP) - a training program consisting of a set of educational modules aimed at developing key competencies in students.

Education quality - an integral characteristic of the education system that reflects the degree of conformity of the actual educational outcomes to the regulatory requirements, social and personal expectations.

Quality monitoring - an independent, documented process of objective assessment of quality aimed at determining the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.

Learning outcomes - a set of competencies that express what the learner will understand or be able to do upon completion of the learning process.

Quality assurance in education - the process of creating conditions that contribute to the quality of education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curriculum, and program).

Guarantee - objectively and substantively assess the results of education, thereby guaranteeing its quality level.

Quality improvement - systematic activities of the university aimed at continuous improvement of process effectiveness and efficiency.

Conditions for implementing the educational program - a combination of personnel, material and technical, educational and methodological, informational, financial, and social support for the educational process.

Key competencies of a university graduate - systemic thinking (critical, strategic), creativity, communication (interdisciplinary, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, awareness, objective assessment and decision-making, creative capacity, readiness to embrace the new.

Quality indicators - a guiding principle for improving quality that serves the function of measuring and signaling the quality of the educational process.

Categories of quality indicators: quantitative, qualitative, input, process indicators, output, strategic indicators, actions.

Quality culture - quality is consciously embedded in the everyday activities of the faculty. The faculty evaluates its own practice in line with external requirements and contributes to the improvement of personnel training.

SWOT analysis - a method of strategic planning that involves identifying internal and external factors of the organization's environment.

Student-centered learning - represents both a mindset and a culture within the faculty and is characterized by innovative teaching methods aimed at promoting learning through interaction with teachers and other students, as well as perceiving students as active participants in their own learning.

3. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

3.1. The objective of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the Law Faculty, taking into account the specificity of preparing specialists for judicial bodies, law enforcement agencies, justice organizations, legal services of civil society institutions, and the higher legal education system.

3.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the Faculty of Law include:

• Ensuring comprehensive planning and management of educational activities through a system of principles aimed at improving the quality of legal education to meet international standards of higher and postgraduate education.

• Supporting and fostering academic traditions and innovations in legal education.

• Implementing students' rights to participate in educational process management to ensure the protection of students' rights in receiving quality education and to assist the Faculty of Law in addressing the challenges of preparing competitive graduates for government service, law enforcement agencies, and judicial bodies.

• Enhancing and updating the substantive, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposefully developing competitive graduate specialists in law, who are ready for continuous professional growth, social and professional mobility.

• Implementing educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for unlocking the research potential of legal specialists, who are prepared for productive research activities.

• Implementing programs of cooperation with employers on targeted training of high-level legal specialists, particularly with employers in the law enforcement sphere, judicial system, justice, and executive bodies at all levels

4. FUNCTIONS

4.1. The Academic Committee for Education Quality at the Faculty of Law:

• Reviews and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the Faculty of Law at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs (design, planning, organization, and provision) and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.

• Develops recommendations.

• Monitors the implementation of recommendations as well as monitoring educational activities.

4.2. The Committee addresses issues of academic integrity.

4.3. The Committee reviews the performance monitoring results of students enrolled in the "Jurisprudence" educational programs in order to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

4.4. The Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the "Jurisprudence" educational program.

4.5. Decisions of the Committee on matters of academic integrity serve as a basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

5. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

5.1. The composition of the Committee is approved by the decision of the Academic Council of the Faculty of Law and consists of experienced teachers with at least 10-15 years of scientific and methodological work experience, employers, students, and graduates. Students should constitute no less than 20% of the total composition of the Committee.

5.2. Employees holding managerial positions at the Faculty of Law cannot be members of the Committee.

5.3. Participation in the Committee's work is voluntary.

5.4. The composition of the Committee is approved for a period of not less than 2 years, with the possibility of replacing members and including new members as necessary, based on the presentation of the Academic Council of the Faculty of Law.

5.5. The Chairperson of the Committee is elected by the members of the Committee through a general vote.

5.6. A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Committee to keep minutes of the meetings.

5.7. The membership of the Committee is approved during a meeting of the Academic Council of the Faculty of Law through an open vote.

5.8. Quality education issues are discussed at Committee meetings as needed, but no less than once per semester.

5.9. The Committee carries out its activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the Academic Council of the Faculty of Law for the academic year.

5.10. The meetings of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty are documented with protocols.

5.11. The Committee's report is submitted for consideration by the Academic Council at least once a year.

5.12. The Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the framework of various activities of the Committee, if necessary for the resolution of tasks and functions entrusted to the Committee.

5.13. The Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

5.14. The Committee has the right to:

- submit to the Academic Council of the Faculty of Law issues related to the activities of the Committee;
- make suggestions to the Dean of the Faculty of Law, organizations, and associations on matters related to the Committee's purview;
- request the necessary references and documents for the Committee's activities;
- contribute to and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the Faculty of Law;
- provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms, and methods of teaching;
- hear reports from heads of structural units at its meetings;
- not consider and return for revision poorly prepared and careless documents.

Members of the Committee have the right to:

- make suggestions for improving all aspects of the educational process;
- appoint and conduct expertise and establish commissions for various types of audits;
- request necessary documents from any departmental teacher, dean's office staff, or any university employee within their competence;
- involve teachers in carrying out specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

This Regulation establishes the principles for the organization of the Academic Committee for Quality Education at Al-Farabi Business School. 
The Committee is a collegial executive and administrative body that operates in accordance with the current legal and regulatory acts in the field of education in the Republic of Kazakhstan and the university's normative documents. 
The Committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of Al-Farabi Business School. 
The Committee is accountable to the member of the board - the vice-rector for academic affairs, the director of the department for academic affairs.
The Committee is an independent structure.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation:

Process - a set of interconnected and interacting activities that transform inputs into outputs.

Credit-based learning technology - learning based on the choice and independent planning by the learner of a sequence of studying disciplines using credits as a standardized unit of measurement for the volume of student and teacher workload.

Educational Program (EP) - a training program consisting of a set of educational modules aimed at developing students' key competencies.

Quality of education - an integral characteristic of the education system that reflects the degree of conformity of actual educational outcomes to regulatory requirements, social and personal expectations.

Quality monitoring - an independent, documented process of objectively assessing quality with the aim of determining the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.

Learning outcomes - the set of competencies that express what a learner will understand or be able to do upon completion of the learning process.

Quality assurance - the process of creating conditions that contribute to the quality of education (providing educational resources, infrastructure, curricula, and programs).

Guarantee - objectively and substantively evaluate learning outcomes, thereby ensuring its quality level.

Quality improvement - systematic activities of the university aimed at continuously improving the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.

Conditions for the implementation of the educational program - a set of personnel, material-technical, educational-methodical, informational, financial, and social support for the educational process.

Key competencies of a university graduate - systemic thinking (critical, strategic), creativity, communication (interdisciplinary, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, awareness, objective assessment and decision-making, ability to be creative, readiness to accept new things.

Quality indicators - a guiding principle for improving quality, serving as a measure and signaling the quality of the educational process.

Quality culture - quality is consciously integrated into the daily activities of the faculty. The faculty evaluates its own practice in line with external requirements and contributes to improving personnel training.

SWOT analysis - a method of strategic planning that involves identifying factors of the organization's internal and external environment.

Student-centered learning - a mindset and culture within the faculty characterized by innovative teaching methods aimed at facilitating learning through interactions with teachers and other students, as well as perceiving students as active participants in their own learning.

3. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

3.1. The objective of the Academic Committee for Quality Education is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at Al-Farabi Business School, taking into account the specific preparation in the field of economics.

3.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee for Quality Education at Al-Farabi Business School are:

- Ensuring a comprehensive planning and management system for educational activities aimed at improving the quality of economic education to meet international standards of higher and postgraduate education.
- Supporting and developing academic traditions and innovations in education.
- Implementing students' right to participate in educational process management to protect their rights to receive quality education and assist Al-Farabi Business School in addressing the challenges of preparing competitive graduates.
- Improving and updating the substantive, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposeful formation of competitive graduates capable

- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for realizing the research potential of a specialist prepared for productive research activities.
- Implementation of programs for interaction with employers on matters of targeted training of specialists.

4. FUNCTIONS

4.1. Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculty:

- Considers and evaluates the quality of the educational process at Al-Farabi Business School at the levels of Master's - MBA, Doctoral - DBA (design, planning, organization, provision), and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.
- Develops recommendations.
- Monitors the implementation of recommendations as well as educational activities.

4.2. The Committee considers issues of academic integrity.

4.3. The Committee reviews the results of monitoring the academic performance of students in educational programs in order to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

4.4. The Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the educational program.

4.5. Decisions of the Committee regarding violations of academic integrity serve as a basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

5. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

5.1. The personnel composition of the Committee is approved by the decision of the Academic Council of Al-Farabi Business School, consisting of experienced teachers, employers, students, and graduates.

5.2. Employees of the business school holding managerial positions cannot be members of the Committee.

5.3. Participation in the work of the Committee is voluntary.

5.4. The composition of the Committee is approved for a period of at least 2 years, with the possibility of replacing committee members and including new members as necessary, upon the recommendation of the Academic Council of the business school.

5.5. The Chairman of the Committee is elected by all members of the committee through a general vote.

5.6. A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Committee to keep records of the Committee's meetings.

5.7. The candidacy of the Committee members is approved during a meeting of the Academic Council of the business school through an open vote.

5.8. Issues of the quality of education are discussed at the Committee's meetings as needed, but no less than once per semester.

5.9. The Committee carries out its activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the Academic Council of the business school for the academic year.

5.10. Meetings of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education are documented in protocols.

5.11. The Committee's report is submitted for consideration to the Academic Council at least once a year.

5.12. The Committee interacts with the structural units of the business school, external organizations, and institutions within the framework of various types of Committee activities, if necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

5.13. The Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

5.14. The Committee has the right to:

- Submit to the Academic Council of the business school matters related to the Committee's activities.
- Make recommendations to the director of the business school, organizations, and associations on issues related to the Committee's responsibilities.
- Request necessary references and documents for the Committee's activities.
- Assist and participate in assessing the quality of the educational process at the business school.
- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms, and methods of teaching.
- Hear reports from the heads of structural units at its meetings.
- Reject and return poorly prepared and careless documents for revision.
- Make proposals for improving all aspects of the educational process.
- Appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions

- Not to consider and return for revision documents that are poorly prepared and careless.
- Make proposals for improving all aspects of the educational process.
- Appoint and conduct assessments and establish commissions for various types of audits.
- Demand necessary documents from any faculty member, dean's office employee, or any university staff within its competence.
- Engage teachers to fulfill specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. This Regulation defines the principles of organization of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculties of the university.

1.2. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education is a collegial executive body that governs its activities based on the current legislative acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the normative documents of the university.

1.3. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

2. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

2.1. The objective of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculty is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the faculties of the university.

2.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculty include:

- Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities, aiming to modernize it in line with international standards of higher and postgraduate education.
- Development of academic traditions and innovations in education.
- Implementation of students' rights to participate in the management of the educational process to ensure the protection of their rights to receive quality education and assist the faculty in preparing competitive graduates.
- Enhancement and renewal of the content, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposeful formation of competitive graduates who are ready for continuous professional growth, social, and professional mobility.
- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a prerequisite for the realization of the research potential of specialists, who are ready for productive research work.
- Implementation of programs for cooperation with employers on targeted training of specialists.

3. FUNCTIONS

3.1. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculty:

- Reviews and assesses the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs (design, planning, organization, and provision), and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.
- Develops recommendations.
- Conducts monitoring of the implementation of recommendations and educational activities.

3.2. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education discusses issues related to academic integrity.

3.3. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education reviews the results of monitoring students' academic performance in educational programs in order to develop proposals to improve the quality of teaching disciplines.

3.4. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education reviews reports on the monitoring of student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in educational programs.

3.5. Decisions of the Academic Committee on matters of academic integrity serve as a basis for implementing disciplinary and administrative measures.

4. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

4.1. The composition of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education is approved by the decision of the Faculty Council from experienced teachers with at least 10-15 years of teaching and methodological experience.

4.2. Participation in the work of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education is voluntary.

4.3. The composition of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education is approved for a period of not less than 3 years, with the possibility of replacing committee members and including new members if necessary, based on the proposal of the Faculty Council.

4.4. The Chairperson of the Academic Committee is elected by the members of the committee through a general vote.

4.5. A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Academic Committee to keep records of the committee's meetings.

4.6. The appointment of members of the Academic Committee is approved by an open vote at the Faculty Council meeting.

4.7. Issues of educational quality are discussed at the meetings of the Academic Committee as necessary.

4.8. Meetings of the Academic Committee for Educational Quality at the faculty are documented through protocols.

4.9. The Academic Committee for Educational Quality interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of the Committee's various activities, if necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

4.10. The Academic Committee for Educational Quality is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

4.11. The Academic Committee for Educational Quality has the right to:

- Submit matters related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Academic Council.
- Make recommendations to the dean of the faculty, organizations, and associations on matters related to the Committee's purview.
- Request the necessary information and documents for the activities of the Academic Committee.
- Support and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the faculty.
- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, and teaching methods.
- Hear reports from the heads of structural units during its meetings.
- Decline to consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision.
- Appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions for various types of audits.
- Demand necessary documents from any department faculty member, dean's office employee, or any university staff member within its jurisdiction.
- Engage teachers to carry out specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. This Provision defines the principles of organization of the Academic Committee for Quality Education at the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology (hereinafter referred to as the Committee).

1.2. This Provision is a document of the quality management system of the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology.

1.3. The Committee is a collegial executive body that governs its activities based on the current legislative acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.

1.4. The Committee (AKKO) is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

1.5. The Committee is accountable to the Member of the Board - Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, Director of the Department for Academic Affairs.

1.6. The Committee is an independent structure.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Provision:

Process - a set of interrelated and interacting activities that transform inputs into outputs.

Credit-based learning - learning based on the choice and independent planning by students of the sequence of studying disciplines using credit as a standardized unit of measurement for the volume of educational work of students and teachers.

Educational program (hereinafter referred to as EP) - a training program that includes a set of educational modules aimed at developing key competencies in students.

Education quality - an integral characteristic of the education system reflecting the degree of conformity of the actual educational outcomes achieved to the regulatory requirements, social and personal expectations.

Quality monitoring - an independent, documented process of objective evaluation of quality aimed at determining the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.

Learning outcomes - a set of competencies that express what a learner will understand or be able to do upon completion of the learning process.

Education quality assurance - the process of creating conditions that contribute to the quality of education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curriculum, and program).

Guarantee - an objective and substantiated assessment of educational outcomes, thus ensuring their quality.

Quality improvement - systematic activities of the university aimed at continuously improving the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.

Conditions for implementing the educational program - a combination of personnel, material and technical, educational and methodological, informational, financial, and social support for the educational process.

Key competencies of a university graduate - systems thinking (critical, strategic), creativity, communication (interdisciplinary, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, awareness, objective assessment and decision making, creative ability, readiness to embrace the new.

Quality indicators - a guiding principle for improving quality that serves the function of measuring and signaling the quality of the educational process.

Categories of quality indicators: quantitative, qualitative, input, process indicators, output, strategic, actions.

Quality culture - quality is consciously integrated into the daily activities of the faculty. The faculty evaluates its own practices in line with external requirements and contributes to the improvement of staff training.

SWOT analysis - a strategic planning method that involves identifying internal and external factors of an organization's environment.

Student-centered learning - represents both a mindset and a culture within the faculty and is characterized by innovative teaching methods aimed at promoting student learning through interaction with teachers and other students, as well as perceiving students as active participants in their own learning.

3. GOAL AND MAIN OBJECTIVES

3.1. The goal of the Academic Committee for Quality Education is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, taking into account the specificities of training specialists in the field of biological and related sciences.

3.2. The main objectives of the Academic Committee for Quality Education at the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology include:

- The complexity of planning and managing educational activities is ensured by a system of principles aimed at improving the quality of education to meet international standards of higher and postgraduate education.

- The development of academic traditions and innovations in education.

- Implementation of students' right to participate in educational process management to ensure the protection of students' rights in receiving quality education and to assist the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology in addressing the challenges of preparing competitive graduates.

- Improvement and updating of the content, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposeful formation of a competitive graduate specialist, prepared for continuous professional growth, social, and professional mobility.

- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for revealing the research potential of a specialist, prepared for productive research activities.

- Implementation of programs for interaction with employers regarding targeted training of specialists.

4. FUNCTIONS

4.1. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology:

- Considers and assesses the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral (design, planning, organization, provision) and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.

- Develops recommendations.

- Monitors the implementation of recommendations, as well as the monitoring of educational activities.

4.2. The committee addresses issues of academic integrity.

4.3. The committee reviews the results of monitoring the academic performance of students in educational programs of the faculty in order to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

4.4. The committee reviews reports on the monitoring of student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in educational programs of the faculty.

4.5. Decisions of the committee on matters of academic integrity serve as a basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

5. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

5.1. The composition of the Committee is approved by the decision of the Academic Council of the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, consisting of experienced teachers with at least 10-15 years of scientific and methodological experience, employers, students, and graduates. Students must constitute at least 20% of the total Committee membership.

5.2. Employees holding managerial positions at the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology cannot be members of the Committee.

5.3. Participation in the Committee's work is voluntary.

5.4. The composition of the Committee is approved for a period of at least 2 years, with the possibility of replacing committee members and including new members if necessary, upon the submission of the Academic Council of the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology.

5.5. The Chairperson of the Committee is elected by the general vote of all its members.

5.6. A secretary is appointed from among the committee members to keep records of the Committee's meetings.

5.7. The appointment of committee members is approved at a meeting of the Academic Council of the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology by open voting.

5.8. Quality of education issues are discussed at Committee meetings as needed, but no less than once per semester.

5.9. The Committee carries out its activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the Academic Council of the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology for the academic year.

5.10. The meetings of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty are documented in minutes.

5.11. The Committee's work report is submitted for consideration to the Academic Council at least once a year.

5.12. The Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the framework of various types of committee activities, if necessary for solving tasks and functions entrusted to the Committee.

5.13. The Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions it makes.

Rights:

5.14. The Committee has the right to:

• Submit issues related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Academic Council of the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology.
• Make proposals to the Dean of the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, organizations, and associations on matters related to the Committee's work.
• Request the necessary information and documents for the Committee's activities.
• Assist in and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology.
• Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs, disciplines, classes, and teaching methods.
• Hear reports from the heads of structural units during its meetings.
• Refuse to consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision.

Members of the Committee have the right to:

• Make proposals to improve all aspects of the educational process.
• Appoint and conduct audits and create commissions for various types of audits.
• Demand the necessary documents from any faculty member, staff member of the dean's office, or any university employee within their competence.
• Engage teachers to carry out specific tasks.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1 This Regulation establishes the principles for organizing the activities of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the Faculty of Journalism.

1.2 This Regulation is a document of the quality management system of the Faculty of Journalism.

1.3 The Committee is a collegial executive body that governs and operates in accordance with the current regulatory and legal acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the normative documents of the university.

1.4 The Committee (AKCOF) is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the Faculty of Journalism.

1.5 The Committee is accountable in its activities to the Board Member - Vice Rector for Academic Affairs and the Director of the Department for Academic Affairs.

1.6 The Committee is an independent structure.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation:

Process - a set of interrelated and interacting activities that transform inputs into outputs.

Credit-based learning - learning based on the selection and self-planning by students of a sequence of disciplines using credits as a standardized unit of measurement for the volume of student and teacher workload.

Educational Program (hereinafter referred to as "EP") - a training program consisting of a set of educational modules aimed at acquiring key competencies by students.

Education Quality - an integral characteristic of the education system that reflects the degree of compliance of actual educational outcomes with regulatory requirements, social and personal expectations.

Quality Monitoring - an independent, documented process of objectively assessing quality in order to determine the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.

Learning Outcomes - a set of competencies that express what the learner will understand or be able to do upon completion of the learning process.

Education Quality Assurance - the process of creating conditions that contribute to the quality of education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curriculum, and program).

Assurance - objectively and substantively assess the results of education and thereby guarantee its quality level.

Quality Improvement - systematic activities of the university aimed at continuously improving the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.

Conditions for the Implementation of the Educational Program - a set of personnel, material and technical, educational and methodological, informational, financial, and social support for the educational process.

Key Competencies of University Graduates - systemic thinking (critical, strategic), creativity, communication (interdisciplinary, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, awareness, objective assessment and decision-making, ability to be creative, readiness to accept the new.

Quality Indicators - a guiding principle for improving quality, serving the function of measurement and signaling the quality of the educational process.

Categories of quality indicators: quantitative, qualitative, input, process indicators, output, strategic, and action indicators.

Quality Culture - quality consciously integrated into the daily activities of the faculty. The faculty assesses its own practice in accordance with external requirements and contributes to improving staff training.

SWOT Analysis - a method of strategic planning that involves identifying factors in the organization's internal and external environment.

Student-Centered Learning - represents both a mindset and a culture within the faculty characterized by innovative teaching methods aimed at facilitating learning through interaction with teachers and fellow students, as well as perceiving students as active participants in their own learning.

3. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

3.1 The objective of the Academic Committee for Education Quality is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process, taking into account the specific nature of the programs offered by the Faculty of Journalism.

3.2 The main tasks of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the Faculty of Journalism include:

• Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities, based on principles aimed at improving the quality of journalism education in accordance with international standards of higher and postgraduate education.

- Support and development of academic traditions and innovations in journalism education.
- Implementation of students' right to participate in educational process management to ensure the protection of students' rights to quality education and assist the journalism faculty in preparing competitive graduates.
- Improvement and updating of the substantive, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposefully shaping competitive specialist graduates who are ready for continuous professional growth, social, and professional mobility.
- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for unleashing the research potential of specialist individuals prepared for productive research activities.
- Implementation of programs for interaction with employers regarding targeted training of specialists.

4. FUNCTIONS

4.1. Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty:

- Considers and assesses the quality of the educational process at the journalism faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral (design, planning, organization, provision) and provides relevant recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.
- Develops recommendations.
- Monitors the implementation of recommendations and monitors educational activities.

4.2. The Committee addresses issues of academic integrity.

4.3. The Committee reviews the results of monitoring student performance in educational programs to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

4.4. The Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the educational program.

4.5. Decisions of the Committee on matters of academic integrity serve as a basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

5. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

5.1. The composition of the Committee is approved by the decision of the Academic Council of the journalism faculty and includes experienced teachers with a scientific and methodological work experience of at least 10-15 years, employers, students, and graduates. Students should constitute at least 20% of the total Committee membership.

5.2. Faculty members holding managerial positions cannot be members of the Committee.

5.3. Participation in the Committee's work is voluntary.

5.4. The composition of the Committee is approved for a period of at least 2 years with the possibility of replacing members and including new members if necessary, as proposed by the Academic Council of the journalism faculty.

5.5. The Chairperson of the Committee is elected from among the Committee members by a general vote of all its members.

5.6. A secretary is appointed from among the Committee members to keep the minutes of the meetings.

5.7. The candidacy of Committee members is approved by an open vote at a meeting of the Academic Council of the journalism faculty.

5.8. Quality of education issues are discussed at Committee meetings as necessary, but no less than once per semester.

5.9. The Committee conducts its activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the Academic Council of the journalism faculty for the academic year.

5.10. Meetings of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculty are documented with minutes.

5.11. The Committee's work report is presented for review to the Academic Council at least once a year.

5.12. The Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of its various activities, if necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

5.13. The Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

5.14. The Committee has the right to:

- Submit issues related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Academic Council of the journalism faculty.
- Make suggestions to the Dean of the journalism faculty, organizations, and associations on matters related to the Committee's purview.
- Request necessary references and documents for the Committee's activities.
- Support and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the faculty.
- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms, and methods of teaching.
- Hear reports from heads of structural units at its meetings.
- Refuse to consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision.

Members of the Committee have the right to:

- Make suggestions for improving all aspects of the educational process.
- Appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions for various types of audits.
- Demand necessary documents from any faculty member, dean's office staff, or university employee within their competence.
- Engage teachers to fulfill specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1 This Regulation defines the principles of the organization of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculties of the university.

1.2 The Academic Committee is a collegial governing and executive body that operates in accordance with the current legislative acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the university's regulatory documents.

1.3 The Academic Committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

2. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

2.1 The objective of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the university faculties.

2.2 The main tasks of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty include:

- Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities, ensuring the system of principles aimed at its modernization in order to comply with international standards of higher and postgraduate education.
- Development of academic traditions and innovations in education.
- Implementation of students' right to participate in the governance of the educational process, aiming to protect students' rights to receive a quality education and assisting the faculty in addressing the tasks of preparing competitive graduates.
- Improvement and updating of the content, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposeful formation of competitive graduates capable of continuous professional growth, social and professional mobility.
- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for revealing the research potential of a specialist capable of productive research activities.
- Implementation of programs for interaction with employers on targeted training issues.

3. FUNCTIONS

3.1 The Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty:

- Considers and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral (design, planning, organization, provision) and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.
- Develops recommendations.
- Monitors the implementation of recommendations and the educational activities.

3.2 The Academic Committee considers issues of academic integrity.

3.3 The Academic Committee reviews the results of monitoring students' academic performance in educational programs to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

3.4 The Academic Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in educational programs.

3.5 Decisions of the Academic Committee on academic integrity violations serve as the basis for implementing disciplinary and administrative measures.

4. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

4.1 The composition of the Academic Committee is approved by the decision of the Faculty Council from experienced teachers with a scientific and methodological experience of at least 10-15 years.

4.2 Participation in the work of the Academic Committee is voluntary.

4.3 The composition of the Academic Committee is approved for a period of not less than 3 years, with the possibility of replacing committee members and including new members if necessary, as proposed by the Faculty Council.

4.4 The Chairperson of the Academic Committee is elected from among its members by a general vote of all committee members.

4.5 A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Academic Committee to keep records of committee meetings.

4.6 The candidacy of committee members is approved at the Faculty Council meeting through an open vote.

4.7 Education quality issues are discussed at the Academic Committee meetings as necessary.

4.8 Minutes are prepared for the meetings of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty.

4.9 The Academic Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the framework of various activities of the Committee if it is necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

4.10 The Academic Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

4.11 The Academic Committee has the right to:

- Submit questions related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Faculty Council.
- Make suggestions to the faculty dean, organizations, and associations regarding matters within the Committee's purview.
- Request the necessary information and documents for the activities of the Academic Committee.
- Assist and participate in the evaluation of the quality of the educational process at the faculty.
- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms, and methods of teaching.
- Hear reports from the heads of structural units at its meetings.
- Not consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision.
- Appoint and conduct audits and create commissions for various types of audits.
- Require necessary documents from any faculty member, staff member of the dean's office, or any university staff member within its competence.
- Engage teachers to fulfill specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1 This Regulation establishes the principles of organization and functioning of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculties of the university.

1.2 The Academic Committee is a collegial executive body that operates in accordance with the current legislative acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.

1.3 The Academic Committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

2. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

2.1 The objective of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the faculties of the university.

2.2 The main tasks of the Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty include:

- Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities, aiming to modernize it in accordance with international standards of higher and postgraduate education.
- Development of academic traditions and innovations in education.
- Implementation of students' right to participate in the management of the educational process, ensuring the protection of students' rights to receive quality education, and assisting the faculty in addressing tasks related to the preparation of competitive graduates.
- Improvement and updating of the content, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposefully shaping competitive graduates who are ready for continuous professional growth, social and professional mobility.
- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities, as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for revealing the research potential of the individual, who is prepared for productive research activities.
- Implementation of programs for cooperation with employers regarding targeted training of specialists.

3. FUNCTIONS

3.1 The Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty:

- Reviews and assesses the quality of the educational process at the faculty on three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs (design, planning, organization, and provision) and provides relevant recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.
- Develops recommendations.
- Monitors the implementation of recommendations and the educational activities.

3.2 The Academic Committee reviews matters related to academic integrity.

3.3 The Academic Committee reviews the results of students' academic performance monitoring in educational programs in order to develop proposals to improve the quality of teaching disciplines.

3.4 The Academic Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the educational program.

3.5 Decisions of the Academic Committee on matters of academic integrity violations serve as the basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

4. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

4.1 The personnel of the Academic Committee are approved by the decision of the Faculty Academic Council and consist of experienced teachers who have at least 10-15 years of scientific and methodological work experience.

4.2 Participation in the work of the Academic Committee is voluntary.

4.3 The composition of the Academic Committee is approved for a period of not less than 3 years, with the possibility of replacing committee members and including new members if necessary, as proposed by the Faculty Academic Council.

4.4 The Chairperson of the Academic Committee is elected from among the committee members by a general vote of all its members.

4.5 A secretary is appointed from among the committee members to keep minutes of the Academic Committee meetings.

4.6 The candidates for members of the Academic Committee are approved by an open vote during the Faculty Academic Council meeting.

4.7 Issues related to the quality of education are discussed at the Academic Committee meetings as necessary.

4.8 The Academic Committee for Education Quality at the faculty keeps records of its meetings in the form of minutes.

4.9 The Academic Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of its activities, if necessary for the resolution of tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

4.10 The Academic Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

4.11 The Academic Committee has the right to:

- Submit matters related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Faculty Academic Council.
- Make recommendations to the faculty dean, organizations, and associations on matters related to the Committee's responsibilities.
- Request necessary information and documents for the work of the Academic Committee.
- Facilitate and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the faculty.
- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms, and methods of teaching.
- Hear reports from the heads of structural units at its meetings.
- Refuse to consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision.
- Appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions for various types of audits.
- Request necessary documents from any faculty member, staff member of the dean's office, or any university staff member within its competence.
- Engage faculty members to fulfill specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. These Rules establish the principles for the organization of the activities of the Academic Committee for Education Quality and Training at the Faculty of Philology (hereinafter referred to as the Committee).

2. The Committee is a collegial, governing, and executive body that operates in accordance with the regulatory legal acts and normative documents of the university in the field of education in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

3. The Committee is intended for the comprehensive monitoring and control of the educational policy of the faculty.

2. BASIC CONCEPTS AND TERMS

Educational Program - a training program consisting of a set of educational modules aimed at developing students' core competencies.

Conditions for the Implementation of the Educational Program - a combination of human resources, material and technical resources, educational and methodological resources, information resources, financial resources, and social support for the educational process.

Education Quality - an integral characteristic of the education system reflecting the degree of compliance of the actual educational outcomes with the normative requirements.

Quality Assurance in Education - the process of creating conditions that influence the quality of education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curriculum, and programs).

Quality Enhancement - systematic activities of the organization aimed at continuous improvement.

Quality Monitoring - an independent, documented process of objective assessment of the quality of education and training.

Quality Indicators - guiding principles for quality improvement, functions for measuring the quality of the educational process.

3. GOALS AND MAIN TASKS OF THE COMMITTEE

3.1. The goal of the Academic Committee for Education Quality and Training at the faculty is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the university's faculties.

3.2. The main tasks of the Academic Committee for Education Quality and Training at the faculty include:

- Formulating a perspective model of university education.
- Ensuring the quality of education and the competitiveness of students.
- Planning educational and teaching activities in accordance with international standards.
- Improving and updating the content of educational programs with the development of educational innovations.
- Developing and updating educational programs to ensure academic mobility.
- Establishing cooperation with employers regarding targeted training of specialists.

4. FUNCTIONS OF THE ACADEMIC COMMITTEE

4.1 Academic Committee for Education and Learning Quality at the Faculty:

- Reviews and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral (design, planning, organization, provision) and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.

- Monitors and conducts expertise on curriculum, catalogs of elective disciplines, course descriptions, specialty curricula, in accordance with the requirements of the State Accreditation Commission, National Qualifications Framework, industry frameworks, and professional standards.

- Develops recommendations to improve the quality of teaching disciplines based on the monitoring of student performance and their satisfaction with the quality of education.

- Monitors the implementation of recommendations as well as the activities of education and learning.

- Addresses issues of academic loyalty.

- Considers the results of monitoring student performance in educational programs in order to make proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

4.2 Decisions of the Committee regarding violations of academic integrity serve as a basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

5. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE ACADEMIC COMMITTEE

1. The Academic Committee consists of a chairperson, members, and a secretary.

2. The Chairperson of the Committee is approved by an open vote at a meeting of the Faculty Council.

3. The Chairperson is directly responsible for overseeing the activities of the Committee.

4. The Chairperson provides guidance and coordination of the Committee's activities. A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Committee to keep minutes of the meetings.

Candidates for Committee membership are approved by an open vote at a meeting of the Faculty Council.

The composition of the Committee is approved for a period of not less than 2 years, with the possibility of replacing Committee members and including new members based on the recommendation of the Faculty Council.

5. The Committee's work is carried out in accordance with the annual work plan adopted at the faculty's academic council meeting. The formation of the annual work plan is done taking into account the university's development program.

6. Committee meetings are held no less than once a month in accordance with the annual work plan.

7. The secretary ensures the organizational preparation, agenda formation, and coordination of the Committee's meetings, informing the members at least 7 calendar days before the start of the meeting.

8. Recommendations of the Committee are adopted and documented by a majority vote of the attending members based on the issues discussed during the Committee's meetings.

9. Each member must attend all Committee meetings, actively participate, and timely fulfill assigned tasks.

10. A Committee meeting is considered valid if at least two-thirds of its members are present.

11. The Chairperson of the Committee reports to the Faculty Council on the results of the Committee's activities once per semester.

6. RIGHTS OF THE ACADEMIC COMMITTEE

The Committee has the right to:

- Submit matters related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Faculty Council.

- Make suggestions to the faculty dean, organizations, associations regarding matters within the Committee's purview.

- Request information and documents necessary for the Committee's activities.

- Evaluate the quality of the educational and learning processes at the faculty.

- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, course curricula, teaching methodologies, forms, and methods of instruction.

- Hear reports from heads of structural units during its meetings.

- Review and return for revision any documents that are of low quality or poorly prepared.

Members of the Committee have the right to:

- Make suggestions for improving all aspects of the educational process.

- Appoint and conduct internal and external audits and establish commissions.

- Demand necessary documents from any faculty member, dean's office staff, or university employee within their competence.

- Engage faculty members to perform specific tasks.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1 This Regulation defines the principles for organizing the activities of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology (hereinafter referred to as the Committee).

1.2 The Committee is a collegial, executive body of management that operates in accordance with the current legislative acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.

1.3 The Committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational process at the faculty.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation:

Process - a set of interconnected and interacting activities that transform inputs into outputs.

Educational Program (hereinafter referred to as EP) - a training program that includes a set of educational modules aimed at developing key competencies in students.

Quality of education - an integral characteristic of the education system, reflecting the degree of conformity of actual educational outcomes to regulatory requirements, social, and personal expectations.

Quality monitoring - an independent, documented process of objective assessment of quality aimed at determining the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.

Quality assurance in education - the process of creating conditions that contribute to the quality of education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curricula, and programs).

Quality improvement - systematic activities of an organization aimed at continuously improving the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.

Conditions for implementing the educational program - a set of human, material and technical, educational and methodological, informational, financial, and social support for the educational process.

Quality indicators - a guiding principle for improving quality, serving as a measure and signaling the quality of the educational process.

3. GOAL AND MAIN OBJECTIVES

3.1 The goal of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculty is to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process.

3.2 The main tasks of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the faculty include:

- Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities, which is ensured by a system of principles aimed at its modernization to meet international standards of higher and postgraduate education.

- Development of academic traditions and innovations in education.

- Implementation of students' right to participate in the management of the educational process to ensure the protection of their rights to receive a quality education, as well as to assist the faculty in addressing the challenges of preparing competitive graduates.

- Improvement and renewal of the substantive, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposeful formation of a competitive specialist graduate ready for continuous professional growth, social, and professional mobility.

- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for revealing the research potential of a specialist's personality, prepared for productive research activities.

- Monitoring programs of interaction between departments and employers on issues of targeted training of specialists.

4. FUNCTIONS

4.1. Academic Quality Committee at the faculty:

- Reviews and evaluates the quality of the educational process (design, planning, organization, and provision) at the faculty at all three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs.

- Develops and provides relevant recommendations aimed at improving the quality of the educational process at the faculty.

- Monitors the implementation of recommendations and the educational activities.

4.2. The committee addresses issues of academic integrity.

4.3. The committee examines the performance monitoring results of students in educational programs to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines and program content.

4.4. The committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the educational program.

4.5. Decisions of the committee on academic integrity violations serve as a basis for implementing disciplinary and administrative measures.

5. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

5.1. The faculty committee is composed of experienced teachers with at least 10-15 years of scientific, pedagogical, and methodological work experience. The committee's composition is approved by the Faculty Council.

5.2. Participation in the committee's work is voluntary.

5.3. The committee's composition is approved for a period of at least 2 years with the possibility of replacing members and including new members if necessary, as proposed by the Faculty Council.

5.4. The committee chairperson is elected by a general vote of all committee members.

5.5. A secretary is appointed from among the committee members to keep records of committee meetings.

5.6. Committee member nominations are approved by an open vote at the Faculty Council meeting.

5.7. Education quality matters are discussed at committee meetings as needed but no less than once per semester.

5.8. Meetings of the Academic Quality Committee at the faculty are documented through protocols.

5.9. The committee interacts with the faculty's structural units, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of its various activities, if necessary for fulfilling the tasks and functions assigned to the committee.

5.10. The committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

5.11. The committee has the right to:

- Submit matters related to the committee's activities for consideration by the Faculty Council.

- Make recommendations to the faculty dean, organizations, and associations on issues related to the committee's mandate.

- Request necessary information and documents for the committee's work.

- Facilitate and participate in the evaluation of the quality of the educational process at the faculty.

- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, teaching sessions, forms and methods of instruction.

- Hear reports from the heads of structural units at its meetings.

- Refuse to consider and return poorly prepared and negligent documents for revision.

Committee members have the right to:

- Make suggestions for improving all aspects of the educational process.

- Appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions for various types of audits.

- Demand necessary documents from department faculty, dean's office staff, and university employees within their competence.

- Engage teachers to fulfill specific tasks.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1 This Regulation establishes the principles for organizing the activities of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the Faculty of International Relations. 1.2 This Regulation is a document of the quality management system of the faculty. 1.3 The Committee is a collegial governing and executive body that operates in accordance with the current legal and regulatory acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the normative documents of the university. 1.3 The Committee (ACQET) is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty. 1.4 The Committee is accountable to the Member of the Board - Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs, Director of the Department of Academic Affairs. 1.5 The Committee is an independent structure.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation: Process - a set of interrelated and interacting types of activities that transform inputs into outputs. Credit-based learning technology - learning based on the choice and independent planning by the learner of the sequence of studying disciplines using credit as a standardized unit of measurement of the student's and teacher's workload. Educational program (hereinafter referred to as EP) - a training program consisting of a set of educational modules aimed at acquiring key competencies by the learners. Quality of education - an integral characteristic of the education system reflecting the degree of conformity of the actual educational outcomes to the normative requirements, social and personal expectations. Quality monitoring - an independent, documented process of objective assessment of quality with the aim of determining the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria. Learning outcomes - sets of competencies that express what the learner will understand or be able to do upon completion of the learning process. Quality assurance in education - the process of creating conditions that contribute to the quality of education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curricula, and programs). Assurance - objectively and substantively assess the educational outcomes and thereby guarantee its quality level. Quality improvement - systematic activities of the university aimed at continuous improvement of the effectiveness and efficiency of processes. Conditions for implementing the educational program - a combination of personnel, material and technical, educational and methodological, information, financial, and social support of the educational process. Key competencies of university graduates - systems thinking (critical, strategic), creativity, communication (interdisciplinary, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, mindfulness, objective assessment and decision-making, ability to be creative, readiness to accept the new. Quality indicators - a guiding principle of quality improvement that serves the function of measurement and signaling the quality of the educational process. Categories of quality indicators: quantitative, qualitative, input, process indicators, output, strategic, actions. Quality culture - quality is consciously integrated into the everyday activities of the faculty. The faculty assesses its own practices in line with external requirements and contributes to the improvement of personnel training. SWOT analysis - a strategic planning method that involves identifying internal and external factors of the organization's environment. Student-centered learning - represents both a mindset and a culture within the faculty, characterized by innovative teaching methods aimed at facilitating student learning in interaction with teachers and other students, as well as perceiving students as active participants in their own learning.

3. OBJECTIVE AND MAIN TASKS

3.1 The objective of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching is to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the faculty, taking into account the specificities of specialist training. 3.2 The main tasks of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the faculty include:

• Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities through a system of principles aimed at improving the quality of education to meet international standards of higher and postgraduate education;

• - Support and development of academic traditions and innovations in education;
  - Implementation of students' right to participate in educational governance to ensure the protection of students' rights in receiving quality education and to assist the faculty in addressing the challenges of preparing competitive graduates;
  - Enhancement and updating of the substantive, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposefully shaping competitive graduate specialists;
  - Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of academic and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for unleashing the research potential of the specialist's personality;
  - Implementation of programs for interaction with employers regarding targeted training of specialists.

  4 FUNCTIONS

4.1 Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the faculty:
- Reviews and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs (design, planning, organization, provision) and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university;
- Develops recommendations;
- Monitors the implementation of recommendations, as well as educational activities.

4.2 The Committee reviews issues of academic integrity.

4.3 The Committee examines the results of monitoring the academic performance of students in educational programs in order to develop proposals for improving the quality of discipline teaching.

4.4 The Committee reviews reports on monitoring students' satisfaction with the quality of teaching in educational programs.

4.5. Decisions of the Committee on academic integrity violations serve as the basis for implementing disciplinary and administrative measures.

5 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

5.1. The personnel of the Academic Committee is approved by the decision of the Faculty Council from experienced teachers with at least 10-15 years of scientific and methodological experience.

5.2. Participation in the work of the Academic Committee is voluntary.

5.3. The composition of the Academic Committee is approved for a period of at least 3 years with the possibility of replacing members and including new members if necessary, based on the recommendation of the Faculty Council.

5.4. The Chairperson of the Academic Committee is elected from among the members of the committee by a general vote of all its members.

5.5. A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Academic Committee to keep minutes of the committee meetings.

5.6. The candidacy of Academic Committee members is approved by an open vote at a Faculty Council meeting.

5.7. Issues related to the quality of education are discussed at Academic Committee meetings as needed.

5.8. Meetings of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the faculty are documented in protocols.

5.9. The Academic Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of its various activities, if necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the committee.

5.10. The Academic Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

5.11. The Academic Committee has the right to:
- submit issues related to the committee's activities for consideration by the Faculty Council;
- make proposals to the dean of the faculty, organizations, and associations on matters related to the committee's responsibilities;
- request necessary certificates and documents for the activities of the Academic Committee;
- contribute to and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the faculty;
- provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, classes, forms, and methods of teaching;
- hear reports from the heads of structural units at its meetings;
- reject and return poorly prepared and negligent documents for revision;
- appoint and conduct audits and create commissions for various types of audits;
- demand necessary documents from any faculty member, dean's office staff, or university employee within its competence;
- engage teachers to fulfill specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. This Regulation establishes the principles of organization of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the Higher School of Economics and Business.

1.2. The Committee is a collegial executive and administrative body that operates in accordance with the current regulatory and legal acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the university's regulatory documents.

1.3. The Committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the Higher School of Economics and Business.

1.4. The Committee is accountable to the Member of the Board - Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs and the Director of the Department for Academic Affairs in its activities.

1.5. The Committee is an independent structure.

2. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

The following terms and definitions are used in this Regulation:

Process - a set of interconnected and interacting types of activities that transform inputs into outputs.

Credit-based learning technology - learning based on the choice and independent planning by the student of the sequence of studying disciplines using credits as a standardized unit of measurement of the workload of the student and the teacher.

Educational Program (hereinafter referred to as "EP") - a training program that includes a set of educational modules aimed at acquiring key competencies by students.

Quality of Education - an integral characteristic of the education system, reflecting the degree of compliance of actual educational outcomes with regulatory requirements, social and personal expectations.

Quality Monitoring - an independent, documented process of objective assessment of quality aimed at determining the degree of compliance with monitoring criteria.

Learning Outcomes - a set of competencies that express what the learner will understand or be able to do upon completion of the learning process.

Quality Assurance - the process of creating conditions conducive to quality education (provision of educational resources, infrastructure, curricula, and programs).

Guarantee - objectively and reasonably assess the learning outcomes and thereby guarantee their quality level.

Quality Enhancement - the systematic activity of the university aimed at continuous improvement of the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.

Conditions for the Implementation of the Educational Program - a set of personnel, material and technical, educational and methodological, informational, financial, and social support for the educational process.

Key Competencies of a University Graduate - systemic thinking (critical, strategic), creativity, communication (interdisciplinary, informational), multiculturalism and openness, project and process management, flexibility, awareness, objective assessment and decision-making, ability to be innovative, readiness to embrace the new.

Quality Indicators - a guiding principle for quality improvement, serving the function of measuring and signaling the quality of the educational process.

Quality Culture - the conscious integration of quality into the daily activities of the faculty. The faculty assesses its own practice in accordance with external requirements and contributes to the improvement of personnel training.

SWOT Analysis - a strategic planning method that involves identifying internal and external factors of an organization's environment.

Student-Centered Learning - represents both a mindset and a culture within the faculty and is characterized by innovative teaching methods aimed at facilitating learning through interaction with teachers and other students, as well as perceiving students as active participants in their own learning.

4 FUNCTIONS

4.1 Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the Faculty:

- examines and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the School of Economics and Business at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs (design, planning, organization, provision), and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university;

- develops recommendations;

- monitors the implementation of recommendations and the educational activities.

4.2 The Committee addresses issues of academic integrity.

4.3 The Committee reviews the performance monitoring results of students in educational programs with the aim of developing proposals to enhance the quality of teaching disciplines.

4.4 The Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the educational program.

4.5 The decisions of the Committee regarding academic integrity violations serve as a basis for implementing disciplinary and administrative measures.

5 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, RIGHTS

5.1 The composition of the Committee is approved by the decision of the Academic Council of the School of Economics and Business, consisting of experienced teachers, employers, students, and graduates.

5.2 Faculty staff holding managerial positions cannot be members of the Committee.

5.3 Participation in the Committee's work is voluntary.

5.4 The composition of the Committee is approved for a period of at least 2 years, with the possibility of replacing members and including new members if necessary, as proposed by the Faculty's Academic Council.

5.5 The Chairperson of the Committee is elected by a general vote of all its members.

5.6 A secretary is appointed from among the Committee members to keep the minutes of the meetings.

5.7 The appointment of Committee members is approved by an open vote at the Faculty's Academic Council meeting.

5.8 The quality of education matters are discussed during the Committee's meetings as necessary, but no less than once per semester.

5.9 The Committee carries out its activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the Faculty's Academic Council for the academic year.

5.10 Meetings of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education at the Faculty are documented in protocols.

5.11 The Committee's report is submitted for review to the Academic Council at least once a year.

5.12 The Committee interacts with the Faculty's structural units, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of its various activities, if necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

5.13 The Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of its decisions.

5.14 The Committee has the right to:

- submit matters related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Academic Council of the School of Economics and Business;

- make proposals to the Dean of the School of Economics and Business, organizations, and associations on matters related to the Committee's responsibilities;

- request necessary information and documents for the Committee's activities;

- facilitate and participate in the evaluation of the quality of the educational process at the School of Economics and Business;

- provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes of educational programs and disciplines, class sessions, and forms and methods of teaching;

- hear reports from heads of structural units at its meetings;

- refuse to consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision;

- make suggestions for improving all aspects of the educational process;

- appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions for various types of audits;

- request necessary documents from any department faculty, dean's office staff, or university staff within its competence;

- involve faculty members to fulfill specific assignments.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. This document outlines the principles of organization for the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics (hereinafter referred to as the Committee).

1.2. This document is part of the quality management system of the Mechanics and Mathematics Faculty at al-Farabi Kazakh National University.

1.3. The Committee is a collegial executive body that operates in accordance with the current legislative acts in the field of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the regulatory documents of the university.

1.4. The Committee is responsible for comprehensive monitoring and support of the educational policy of the faculty.

1.5. The Committee is accountable to the Member of the Board - Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs and the Director of the Department for Academic Affairs.

1.6. The Committee is an independent structure.

2. GOAL AND MAIN OBJECTIVES

2.1. The goal of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the faculty is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the educational process at the university's faculties.

2.2. The main objectives of the Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the faculty include:

- Comprehensive planning and management of educational activities, ensuring its modernization to comply with international standards of higher and postgraduate education.

- Development of academic traditions and innovations in education.

- Implementation of students' rights to participate in educational process management to ensure the protection of their rights in receiving quality education and to assist the faculty in addressing the tasks of preparing competitive graduates.

- Improvement and updating of the substantive, motivational, and value components of educational programs as a means of purposefully shaping a competitive graduate specialist ready for continuous professional growth, social, and professional mobility.

- Implementation of educational programs based on the synthesis of educational and research activities as a means of improving the scientific content of educational programs and as a mandatory condition for disclosing the research potential of a specialist, prepared for productive research activities.

- Implementation of programs for interaction with employers on issues related to targeted training of specialists.

3. FUNCTIONS

3.1. The Academic Committee for the Quality of Education and Teaching at the faculty:

- Reviews and evaluates the quality of the educational process at the faculty at three levels: bachelor's, master's, and doctoral programs (designing, planning, organization, and provision) and provides corresponding recommendations to all authorized structural units of the university.

- Develops recommendations.

- Monitors the implementation of recommendations and educational activities.

3.2. The Committee addresses issues of academic integrity.

3.3. The Committee reviews the results of students' academic performance monitoring in educational programs to develop proposals for improving the quality of teaching disciplines.

3.4. The Committee reviews reports on monitoring student satisfaction with the quality of teaching in the educational program.

3.5. Decisions of the Committee regarding violations of academic integrity serve as a basis for applying disciplinary and administrative measures.

4. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, POWERS

4.1. The composition of the Committee is approved by the decision of the Faculty Council, consisting of experienced teachers with a scientific and methodological work experience of at least 10-15 years, employers, students, and alumni. Students must comprise at least 20% of the total membership of the Committee.

4.2. University employees and faculty members holding managerial positions cannot be members of the Committee.

4.3. Participation in the work of the Committee is voluntary.

4.4. The composition of the Committee is approved for a period of not less than 2 years, with the possibility of replacing members and including new members if necessary, as proposed by the Faculty Council.

4.5. The Chairperson of the Committee is elected by a general vote of all its members.

4.6. A secretary is appointed from among the members of the Committee to keep minutes of the Committee meetings.

4.7. The appointment of Committee members is approved by an open vote during a meeting of the Faculty Council.

4.8. Quality of education matters are discussed during the Committee meetings as needed but no less than once per semester.

4.9. The Committee carries out its activities in accordance with the work plan approved by the Faculty Council for the academic year.

4.10. Meetings of the Academic Committee on the quality of education and teaching at the faculty are documented by minutes.

4.11. The Committee's work report is submitted for consideration by the Faculty Council at least once a year.

4.12. The Committee interacts with the structural units of the faculty, external organizations, and institutions within the scope of its various activities, if necessary to fulfill the tasks and functions assigned to the Committee.

4.13. The Committee is responsible for the objectivity and quality of the decisions made.

4.14. The Committee has the right to:

- Submit matters related to the Committee's activities for consideration by the Faculty Council.
- Make suggestions to the Dean of the faculty, organizations, and associations regarding matters related to the Committee's responsibilities.
- Request necessary certificates and documents for the Committee's activities.
- Contribute to and participate in the assessment of the quality of the educational process at the faculty.
- Provide recommendations on improving the quality of educational programs, educational and methodological complexes, disciplines, classes, and teaching methods.
- Hear reports from the heads of structural units during its meetings.
- Decline to consider and return poorly prepared documents for revision.

Members of the Committee have the right to:

- Make suggestions for improving all aspects of the educational process.
- Appoint and conduct audits and establish commissions for various types of audits.
- Demand necessary documents from any department faculty member, dean's office employee, or any university employee within their competence.
- Engage teachers to fulfill specific tasks.