Debate on “Death Penalty: For and Against”

The participants excelled as orators and analysts, demonstrating a broad outlook and the ability to defend their positions with compelling arguments.

Team 1 — "Pro" advocated for the death penalty as a measure of justice and protection of society from especially dangerous criminals. Their arguments were characterized by logic, emotional resonance, and examples from global practice.

Team 2 — "Con" upheld humanistic values and the human right to life, emphasizing the possibility of judicial errors and the need for penal system reform. Their arguments were profound, philosophically and morally grounded.

 The debate was vibrant, dynamic, and insightful, showcasing the students' high level of preparation, analytical thinking, and respect for opposing viewpoints.